California State University Northridge


MEMORANDUM

California State University, Northridge
Office of the Vice Provost
Information & Technology Resources

DATE: August 28, 1997

TO:
Dr. Charles Lindahl
Interim Senior Vice Chancellor
Academic Affairs

Dr. Tom West
Assistant Vice Chancellor
Information Resources and Technology

Dr. Warren Baker
Chair
Commission on Learning Resources & Instructional Technology

Dr. Blenda J. Wilson
Vice Chair
Commission on Learning Resources & Instructional Technology

FROM:
Susan C. Curzon
Chair
Information Competence Work Group


Information Competence - Interim Report

Background

As you know, in April, 1995, the Information Competence Work Group was charged by the Commission on Learning Resources and Instructional Technology (CLRIT) to develop a systematic program for information competence in the CSU.

Both CLRIT and the Council of Library Directors (COLD), who chose the information competence initiative as part of their strategic plan, considered that every CSU student should be able to:

Over the past two years, the Information Competence Work Group, in collaboration with the Libraries of the CSU and many faculty and staff, has been very active in pursuit of an information competence program for the CSU.  Awareness about the issues and the importance of information competence has been raised substantially by the efforts of many committed to this project.

The Strategy

The Information Competence Work Group believes that information competence will succeed as a priority for the CSU if awareness is constantly raised about the issues and importance of information competence and information about the success and problems of various programs is continually shared.  Therefore, the Information Competence Work Group has taken a four-pronged approach to developing information competence in the CSU.  The four elements are:

The encouragement of programs:  This includes the development of courses or other programs and workshops which cover the wide variety of issues relating to information competence.  All programs should have an assessment component.

The transfer of knowledge about information competence:  This includes providing information on the successes and failures of various programs, new thinking on information competence, teaching the teachers programs, and assessment.

The linkages between programs both within and beyond the CSU:  This includes any multi-campus effort or collaboration between the CSU and other universities, schools or agencies.

The creation and provision of tools to assist with information competence:  This includes the creation of workbooks, software, model lists or any other instructional tool to assist with the teaching and learning of information competence.

The Goals

The Information Competence Work Group has been pursuing ten major goals. All of the proposals granted and programs developed have been directed toward our established goals.  The following are the goals which were contained in the report "Information Competence in the CSU" and endorsed by CLRIT:

  1. To undertake a systematic assessment of student information competence to develop benchmarks.
  2. To develop a model list of information competence skills (any or all disciplines for students graduating from the university).
  3. To develop a model list of information competence skills for K-14 students.
  4. To develop pilot information competence courses that can be transported to any other campus.
  5. To develop a "teaching the teachers" program for faculty.
  6. To develop computer software that enables the teaching of information competence.
  7. To develop faculty workbooks, checklists, and any other tools to help with the teaching of information competence.
  8. To pilot a distance learning effort in information competence.
  9. To collaborate on any information competence effort with universities beyond the CSU.
  10. To collaborate with textbook publishers to incorporate the concepts of information competence.

Baseline Funding Projects

In 96-97, $50,000 was sent to each campus for "Baseline Hardware/Software Access, Training and User Support".  Of that $50,000, it was recommended that $10,000 be allocated for information competence.  A query was sent to all library directors as to the status of the funds.  Twenty library directors responded.  Thirteen campuses followed the recommendation.  Another six libraries responded that the campus had not used the funds for information competence; and one campus provided the funds to the library but it was not used for information competence projects.

The following is a report of the projects as of July, 1997:

Chico:
The Library received $5,000 which it applied to its proposal "Information Competence for Business Students."  The other $5,000 will be supporting a campus wide information literacy initiative.

Fresno:
The Library received $10,000 and used it to develop a "Teaching the Teachers" workshop to provide materials and other support for faculty teaching information competence.

Hayward:
The Faculty Development Center in conjunction with the Library used $20,000 to develop a program on information competence through reforming the General Education program.

Long Beach:
The Library received $10,000 which it used to purchase equipment to improve instruction in the bibliographic instruction lab.

Los Angeles:
Academic Affairs with library participation used its $10,000 to develop an information competence web site.

Monterey Bay:
The Library received $7,000 and used it to develop a self-paced, Web tutorial, an assessment component and an information competence component in the Freshman ProSeminar course.

Northridge:
The Library received $10,000 which it applied to a new 3 unit course on information competence and as a match for its proposal on "Information Competence:  A Workshop Series for Area High Schools and Junior Colleges".

Pomona:
The Library received $10,000 to create an information competence web page that provides access to general library information, reference assistance, and interactive bibliographic instruction for high school students and teachers.

San Bernardino:
The Library received $10,000 to develop a comprehensive bibliography on information literacy and added information literacy resources to the Library's collection.

San Diego: (This paragraph added 10/31/97)
The Social Science Research Lab used the $10,000 to develop and administer student and faculty surveys to determine student access to, use of, and competency in computer/information technology.

San Jose:
The Library and the Library School revised an on-line "workshop" available to all undergraduate students on personal information management for $10,000.

San Luis Obispo:
The Library received $10,000 which it applied to its proposal on "Information Competency Implementation through Interactive Materials".

San Marcos:
The Library received $3,000 which it used as a match for its share of the proposal called "Information Competence for Business Students".  The remaining $7,000 was a match for its proposal called "Information Competence:  A Workshop Series for High Schools".

Sonoma:
The Library received $10,000 which it applied to its proposal on "Information Competency for Business Students".

Proposals Funded

In addition to the Baseline funding, the Information Competence Work Group has awarded 6 proposals over the last two years.  All of these proposals were granted in accordance with the goals established for information competence.

  1. "Developing Information Competencies:  A model list, activities and assessment instrument".
    Awarded to Dominguez Hills for $10,000.
    This project is designed to develop a model list of information competencies for high school, community colleges and lower division CSU students.  This project is being coordinated with Northridge and San Marcos. (see #3 & #4 below)
  2. "Information Competence for Business Students:  A Self-Paced Course".  Awarded to Sonoma, Chico, San Marcos for $18,209.
    This project will design a credit course for business students to be delivered on-line to multiple remote sites via the Web.  Basic research concepts and a core set of information literacy skills will be taught.  A complete course in HTML will be delivered ready for customizing by other librarians.
  3. "Information Competence:  A Workshop Series for Area High Schools and Junior Colleges".
    Awarded to Northridge for $10,000.
    This grant is a collaborative effort with CSU, San Marcos.  See the description of #4 below.
  4. "Information Competence:  A Workshop Series for High Schools".
    Awarded to San Marcos for $7,000.
    A series of workshops will occur for librarians and teachers of high schools and community colleges to discuss mutual goals in information competence; and develop benchmark competencies for grades 9-14.  Both grants are a collaborative effort between Northridge and San Marcos, in cooperation with Dominguez Hills. (see #1 above)
  5. "Information Literacy.  A Credit Course".
    Awarded to Sonoma for $10,000.
    This project will create an information competence course that can be transported to other campuses.  Deliverables include sample syllabi, assignments and assessments, and development of faculty support tools.
  6. "Information Competency Implementation through Interactive Instructional Materials":
    A Systemwide Collaboration.
    Awarded to San Luis Obispo, Pomona, Monterey Bay, Fullerton, Los Angeles for $64,000.

This project will develop multimedia presentations, collaborative in-class exercises, self-paced Web instructional modules, and an electronic workbook. It also supports a central clearinghouse for information competence on the Web.

Other Activities

In addition, the Information Competence Work Group has completed a report called "Information Competence in the CSU"; hosted a successful conference attended by CSU faculty and staff; commissioned a study on student assessment of information competence; launched collaboration with WASC and the UC; and spoken at a variety of conferences on the work in information competence underway in the CSU.

1997-98

The Information Competence Work Group will be sending an RFP to all campuses in September for funding in 1997-98.  We will also be holding a November conference to view the various projects and discuss future issues and initiatives.  Attendees will include the UC.

The Future

The Information Competence Work Group is recommending that it continue until the close of the fiscal year 98-99.  We will be proposing another round of proposals in 98-99, a capstone conference in 1999 to pull together all that we have learned, and the publication of all the various grant deliverables for use by all the campuses.

Information Competence Work Group as of July 7, 1997

cc:    Provost Louanne Kennedy
        COLD
        Information Competence Work Group

Dr. Curzon's Homepage


Campus Home Library Home For comments email: susan.curzon@csun.edu
Last modified: May 16, 2001
http://library.csun.edu/susan.curzon/infocmem.html

Valid HTML 4.01! Level Triple-A conformance icon, 
          W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
1/3/07 EAA